Dear devs, > Thank you very much for the response and kind explanation. > After studying, I will submit to ghc-proposals :)
I submitted a ghc-proposal #76 [1]. Please feedback:) [1]: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/76 Regards, Takenobu 2017-09-26 23:05 GMT+09:00 Takenobu Tani <[email protected]>: > Dear all, > > Thank you very much for the response and kind explanation. > After studying, I will submit to ghc-proposals :) > > Regards, > Takenobu > > > > 2017-09-26 22:56 GMT+09:00 Merijn Verstraaten <[email protected]>: > >> I, too, have wished for the ability to have a separator in large number >> literals. >> >> So a strong +1 from me. >> >> Cheers, >> Merijn >> >> > On 26 Sep 2017, at 15:43, Ben Gamari <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Takenobu Tani <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> >> Hi Rahul, >> >> >> >> Thanks for the explanation. >> >> Hmm, Is not there much need... >> >> >> >> Thank you code example. >> >> I will also look at lexer for my study [1]. >> >> >> > If you do want to try pursuing a language change do feel free to submit >> > a proposal [1]. I would also like the ability to break up large >> > literals. However, why limit it to BinaryLiterals? I would like the same >> > syntax for deciaml and hexadecimal literals as well. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > - Ben >> > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ghc-devs mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
