On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:59 PM, MarLinn <monkle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That sounds reasonable, but also like there *can not be* a way to obtain > that hash at runtime. And therefore, no way to discover the true package > name. > I can think of a hacky way: make sure the symbol table is still present in the executable and that you can find said executable, z-encode the part of the package+version you know and a symbol you know, and look for symbols that start with one and end with the other; the hash will be in between. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
