Hi Mathieu,

On 15 December 2017 at 17:37, Boespflug, Mathieu <[email protected]> wrote:
> b) does that mean
> Cabal is bound by the 3-release policy?

Historically, it hasn't been the case, and I can say that the
3-release backwards compat policy would be an absolute nightmare for
lib:Cabal to implement.
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to