Phyx <loneti...@gmail.com> writes: > Oh and also, neither of those tickets you linked to should prevent you from > using a newer GHC to make shared libraries. > > the Rts.h headers are nothing but convenience functions and you can just > create the prototypes you need in your own headers. > That being said, I think it would be much better if GHC's headers would accommodate C++ compilers, as Herbert suggested in #14784. I suspect we aren't using much C99 in the headers anyways.
Perhaps we should just start by trying a conservative C++11 guard and tighten it later if we find earlier language versions would work. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
