I think it would yield the same code in the end. Maybe it was just seeking to avoid unnecessary clutter in a particularly common case (eg returning I# x).
Seems to have been introduce in commit 731f53de7930c38b5023a871146bd0ec066edf3a Author: simonpj <unknown> Fri Sep 17 09:15:44 1999 +0000 Simon From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org> On Behalf Of Spiwack, Arnaud Sent: 05 September 2018 15:02 To: ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: Rational for the special case in mkWWcpr_help Dear all, The function mkWWcpr_help, which creates a wrapper and a worker after strictness analysis, has a special case when there is a single result of unlifted type: Wrapper: case (..call worker..) of x -> C x Worker: case ( ..body.. ) of C x -> x But I don't understand how it is different from using (# #) as would result from the general case: Wrapper: case (..call worker..) of (# x #) -> C x Worker: case ( ..body.. ) of C x -> (# x #) That is, my understanding of the latter is that it would yield the exact same code. I'm obviously missing something, I'd love to know what. Best, Arnaud
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
