Michal Terepeta <michal.terep...@gmail.com> writes: > Hope you don't mind if I add an opinion of a small/occasional > contributor to the thread. > > Personally, I would prefer a move to GitHub. Mostly due to familiarity > and network effect (pretty much everyone is on GitHub). > > But I would also consider a move to GitLab a big improvement over the > current Phab-based setup. A git-based workflow would be great - I use > arc/Phab too rarely to really invest in learning them better. (I just > figured out the simplest way to use them that seems to work and I'm > sticking to it :) I haven't actually used GitLab before, but it seems > super easy to sign in using GitHub credentials and the interface seems > quite familiar. > > One thing that was already mentioned is the ticket handling and I just > wanted to say "+1". I *really* dislike Trac - it's slow, unintuitive and > every time I use it I need to spend a couple of minutes to find the > guide to its own weird version of markdown... So a better place for > tickets that's tightly integrated with code code hosting/review tools > would be really cool! Which brings an interesting aspect of this > discussion - if I had to choose between "GitHub for code hosting/review > & Trac for tickets" vs "GitLab for everything", I'd prefer the latter. > Thanks for this data point, Michal!
Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
