Sylvain Henry <sylv...@haskus.fr> writes: > Why don't we just put Haddock into GHC's repository? It was proposed in > a previous discussion in February [1] and it would avoid the bad > experience of having it as a submodule while keeping it in sync. > I'm reluctant to keep it in the GHC tree; it really is a separate project with separate maintainership, dependencies, and contributors.
That being said, I do agree that the status quo is pretty poor. I was going to suggest managing it with git-subtree instead, but I'm not sure this would be much of an improvement. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
