Moritz Angermann <moritz.angerm...@gmail.com> writes: > At this point I believe we have ample Linux build capacity. Darwin looks > pretty good as well the ~4 M1s we have should in principle also be able to > build x86_64-darwin at acceptable speeds. Although on Big Sur only. > > The aarch64-Linux story is a bit constraint by powerful and fast CI > machines but probabaly bearable for the time being. I doubt anyone really > looks at those jobs anyway as they are permitted to fail.
For the record, I look at this once in a while to make sure that they haven't broken (and usually pick off one or two failures in the process). > If aarch64 would become a bottle neck, I’d be inclined to just disable > them. With the NCG soon this will likely become much more bearable as > wel, even though we might want to run the nightly llvm builds. > > To be frank, I don’t see 9.2 happening in two weeks with the current CI. > I'm not sure what you mean. Is this in reference to your own 9.2-slated work or the release as a whole? Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
