Hi folks!
I would like to start a discussion (if it hasn't already been done)
around the idea of integrating the various type-classes that Base
offers, that are hidden behind language extensions, in the `stock`
deriving strategy.
I wasn't around when it was all implemented, but I've always lived with
it in my code bases, and I'd like to know if there are deeper issues
pertaining to their exclusion from the `stock` deriving strategy.
Here is the link to the discussion ticket:
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/19707
Cheers, and have a nice week!
--
Hécate ✨
🐦: @TechnoEmpress
IRC: Uniaika
WWW: https://glitchbra.in
RUN: BSD
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
