I’m not aware of any currently. I would be curious about the now relatively old work that Max bolingbroke did for his PhD (I think it was sortah a ghc to Lua JIT?!?)
An important question is : what questions do you want the abstract interpreter to suport? On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:19 AM Csaba Hruska <csaba.hru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if there was an attempt in the past to create an abstract > interpreter for GHC Core or STG to approximate the program runtime > behaviour? > I'm curious because I'd like to turn my external STG interterpreter to an > abstract interpreter using the AAM (Abstracting Abstract Machines) method. > This approach seems promising to me because a single Haskell code base > (ext STG interpreter) could be the specification of the Haskell operational > semantics and also be a detailed static analyzer that could help > optimization transformations. > I'm interested in any attempt that happened during GHC/Haskell evolution. > > Regards, > Csaba Hruska > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
