Agreed and better articulated than what I likely would have said On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:38 AM Sam Derbyshire <sam.derbysh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christiaan, > > As far as I'm concerned that's a worrying regression, and I think you > should file a ticket on the GHC tracker about it. > I believe GHC already contains logic to avoid expanding type synonyms in > error messages in certain situations, but it apparently doesn't apply here. > Hopefully someone more knowledgeable about this can chime in. > > Sam > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
