Sebastian Graf <sgraf1...@gmail.com> writes: > What I don't like: > > - I can't refer to $chunk from other modules > - Everywhere I reference $chunk in a haddock, it gets inlined instead of > appearing with its title or inserting a link with the section name it is > currently decoupled from. > It seems like we could easily fix both of these with a simple change to Haddock: don't inline chunks except in references in the export list (which determine where the chunk will be placed in the output) and ensure that the anchor name of the chunk is predictable (e.g. based on the chunk name). Then references from other modules (e.g. using $MyModule.my_chunk syntax) could simply produce a link to the anchor.
Regardless, I too have long wanted to make Notes consumable from Haddock documentation. It would be great to make progress on this. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
