Is there anywhere on the GHC wiki that explains how to interpret this output,
and says that the type and dictionary applications ARE there, just not shown by
'-ddump-tc'?
Perhaps it would be helpful to add some basic description of what comes out of
the typechecker to a page like this one? (below)
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/commentary/compiler/hsc-main<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.haskell.org%2Fghc%2Fghc%2F-%2Fwikis%2Fcommentary%2Fcompiler%2Fhsc-main&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cab59b17d2f394945ad1e08d9a2b96c81%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637719740212483767%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=WZL1VADZPUlaOACd58K1XZO5MzPOKrfLFMSuBD%2FGW44%3D&reserved=0>
Yes it would! Would you care to start such a wiki page (a new one; don't just
clutter up the one you point to)? You can write down what you know. Don't
worry if you aren't 100% sure - we can correct it. And if you outright don't
know, leave a "What should I say here?" note.
"This late desugaring is somewhat unusual. It is much more common to desugar
the program before typechecking, or renaming, because that presents the renamer
and typechecker with a much smaller language to deal with. However, GHC's
organisation means that
This note is now slightly out of date. We are now, very carefully, doing some
desugaring before typechecking. See
* Note [Handling overloaded and rebindable constructs] in GHC.Rename.Expr
* Note [Rebindable syntax and HsExpansion] in GHC.Hs.Expr
You can and should point to these and similar Notes from the wiki page you
write. Indeed there may be some part of what you write that would be better
framed as Note in GHC's source code.
Thanks!
Simon
PS: I am leaving Microsoft at the end of November 2021, at which point
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> will cease to work. Use
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> instead. (For
now, it just forwards to [email protected].)
From: ghc-devs <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Benjamin Redelings
Sent: 08 November 2021 13:12
To: Richard Eisenberg <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Output language of typechecking pass?
Hi,
Questions:
1. It seems like this separation is actually necessary, in order to apply
generalization only to let arguments written by the programmer, and not to let
bindings introduced during desugaring. Is that right?
I don't think so. That is, if we did it all in one pass, I still think we could
get generalization right.
I guess I asked this question wrong. I mean to say, if we did the two passes
in the reverse order (desugaring first, followed by typechecking), that would
not work, right?
As the wiki says:
"This late desugaring is somewhat unusual. It is much more common to desugar
the program before typechecking, or renaming, because that presents the renamer
and typechecker with a much smaller language to deal with. However, GHC's
organisation means that
* error messages can display precisely the syntax that the user wrote; and
* desugaring is not required to preserve type-inference properties.
"
2. Does the output of type checking contain type lambdas?
Yes. See below.
3. Does the type checking pass determine where to add dictionary arguments?
Yes. See below.
4. Are there any other resources I should be looking at?
Yes. You want to enable -fprint-typechecker-elaboration (and possible
-fprint-explicit-coercions). With the former, you get to see all this stuff
you're looking for. It's normally suppressed so that the output resembles the
user's code.
I hope this helps!
Richard
Hmm... so, I think I see how this works now. I don't think
'-fprint-explicit-coercions' does anything here though.
$ ghc -ddump-tc Test2.hs -fprint-typechecker-elaboration
...
AbsBinds [a_a2hp] [$dNum_a2hB]
{Exports: [g <= g_a2hz
wrap: <>]
Exported types: g :: forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
[LclId]
Binds: g x_aYk y_aYl = (y_aYl * x_aYk) + 1
Evidence: [EvBinds{[W] $dNum_a2hs = $dNum_a2hq
[W] $dNum_a2hw = $dNum_a2hq
[W] $dNum_a2hq = $dNum_a2hB}]}
...
The type and dictionary arguments are visible here (along with the evidence
bindings), but type and dictionary applications are only visible if you use
-ddump-tc-ast, which is a lot more verbose. (I don't think there is another
flag that shows these applications?) Since I didn't initially know what
"evidence" was, and there is nothing to say that a_a2hp is a type lambda
argument, this was pretty opaque until I managed to read the tc-ast and the
light went on.
I can see now that the type and dictionary arguments are added by annotating
the AST.
Is there anywhere on the GHC wiki that explains how to interpret this output,
and says that the type and dictionary applications ARE there, just not shown by
'-ddump-tc'?
Perhaps it would be helpful to add some basic description of what comes out of
the typechecker to a page like this one? (below)
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/commentary/compiler/hsc-main<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.haskell.org%2Fghc%2Fghc%2F-%2Fwikis%2Fcommentary%2Fcompiler%2Fhsc-main&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cab59b17d2f394945ad1e08d9a2b96c81%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637719740212483767%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=WZL1VADZPUlaOACd58K1XZO5MzPOKrfLFMSuBD%2FGW44%3D&reserved=0>
-BenRI
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
