I'd like it to be easier to extend GHC with support for new species of
foreign calls.  Existing support makes it easy to *replace* GHC's
implementation of foreign calls but not to *extend* it.
Details in #20693 (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/20693).

I'd welcome comments, especially from anyone involved with GHCJS.


Norman

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to