Hi Zubin, I'll do the r2 release as you advised.
Thanks, Lei Zhu On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 8:02 PM <ghc-devs-requ...@haskell.org> wrote: > Send ghc-devs mailing list submissions to > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ghc-devs-requ...@haskell.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ghc-devs-ow...@haskell.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ghc-devs digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Allow `base < 5` for package `array` (Lei Zhu) > 2. Re: Allow `base < 5` for package `array` (Zubin Duggal) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:37:09 +0800 > From: Lei Zhu <julytr...@gmail.com> > To: ghc-devs@haskell.org > Subject: Allow `base < 5` for package `array` > Message-ID: > <CAGfc3OtzHGKqN3-6RtwA2Q_iMHMQLZjd5= > mqq80fgson5r5...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi, > > I'm preparing the next `array` release for the coming ghc 9.12. > The process seems boring because I just need to loosen the > upper bound of the `base`, and then make a release. > > Shall I have a larger range like `base < 5` or are there any > restriction in the `base`, so we have to bump the version > one by one? > > Thanks, > Lei Zhu > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20241103/b27eeffd/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:10:20 +0530 > From: Zubin Duggal <zu...@well-typed.com> > To: Lei Zhu <julytr...@gmail.com> > Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org > Subject: Re: Allow `base < 5` for package `array` > Message-ID: > <6rp5i5anpp5my7tlansagwqfay3jbnhuwq5t5gucn62gcdydoc@uufuj53d3fso> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Hi, > > It is best only only allow versions that are known to compile. > Breaking changes in `base` might break the build otherwise. > In this case, as no other changes are needed, we don't need > a new release of `array`. A hackage revision of array-0.5.8.0, > bumping the base bound to allow base-4.21 will be sufficient. > > Along with this, I would appreciate if a commit bumping the bound > in the cabal file was also pushed to the repository, with an > appropriate tag like 0.5.8.0-r2 (as there already seems to be > an r1 revision). > > Thanks, > Zubin > > On 24/11/03 16:37, Lei Zhu wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I'm preparing the next `array` release for the coming ghc 9.12. > >The process seems boring because I just need to loosen the > >upper bound of the `base`, and then make a release. > > > >Shall I have a larger range like `base < 5` or are there any > >restriction in the `base`, so we have to bump the version > >one by one? > > > >Thanks, > >Lei Zhu > > >_______________________________________________ > >ghc-devs mailing list > >ghc-devs@haskell.org > >http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > > > ------------------------------ > > End of ghc-devs Digest, Vol 255, Issue 3 > **************************************** >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
