Dear Mike Thank you! That sounds like a fantastic offer.
I think Andreas, Sam, Teo, Cheng are probably the best people to start with, although others may chime in. But why not also come to the GHC HQ meeting which happens every week at 1300 UTC on Tuesdays? See 2.2 in https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc-hq#2-the-ghc-team Simon On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 at 20:07, Michael Alan Dorman via ghc-devs < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I’m a decade-plus Haskell dabbler who’s now in a position to contribute to > GHC, and I’ve been considering how I might do so most effectively. > > In reading the recent bug report about the contribution experience > <https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/26728>, one takeaway I had > was that improving the testing story could make a big difference—making > sure tests are reliable, trying to make the test suite fail as fast as > possible, etc. > > Since most of my $JOB for the last dozen years was devoted to building > bespoke testing infrastructure and working with engineers to come up with > effective strategies for optimizing fail-fast—and working in a codebase > that, itself, started with an unreliable test suite—this seems like an > issue where I could help. > > Unfortunately, I couldn’t find any documentation on whether there is a > person or a group that is primarily responsible for the testing > infrastructure—no doubt the information is out there somewhere, and I just > didn’t look in the right place—and I would appreciate any pointers as to > who best to talk to in order to get involved. > > Thanks, > > Mike. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
