It used to be, but cryptonite has been unmaintained for a couple of years now and that's somewhat bad for a security-related package.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 2:55 PM Roland Lutz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2026, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Bottom line, the two variants of `mlkem` don't end up offering the same > > API (distinct type signatures, that only look the same). > > Isn't this exactly what Backpack modules are for? If `mlkem` and `tls` > imported a signature for `crypton`/`cryptonite`, depending on either of > these should have `mlkem` and `tls` use the correct version of the API. > > I'm not sure what to make of "somewhat experimental", though: > https://cabal.readthedocs.io/en/stable/how-to-use-backpack.html > > > It may already have been considered, but wouldn't making `tls` compatible > with `cryptonite` solve the issue, too? > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list -- [email protected] > To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: > Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post. > -- brandon s allbery kf8nh [email protected]
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
