Yes. Same with the semaphor logic. Something that should have been contained in ghc :-/
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 12:22, Brandon Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd argue that one is the fault of Backpack itself: it's inherently > GHC-specific and was intended to be used with tooling (that is, Cabal). It > really needed to be a language feature instead of a tooling hack, IMO. > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 11:19 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:35:45AM +0900, Moritz Angermann via ghc-devs >> wrote: >> > I think this highlights another point where cabal is _way_ too tightly >> > coupled with the haskell compiler. >> >> Another example might be the apparently-tight coupling between Backpack >> and Cabal. >> >> Cheers, >> Tom >> >> >> > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
