Am So 26.07.2026 19:39 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs: > I have framed the draft policy so that it is explicitly agnostic about > whether LLMs are, in themselves, good or bad. > > […] > > I personally do not want to express or institutionalise a second-class > status for LLM-assisted contributions. > > […] > > adding language to say that (in this context) “authorship” does not > mean “typed every word”. > > […] > > *Recommend* writing it yourself. […] I have framed it as a > recommendation only. > > […] > > Perhaps in due course we’ll want a channel for LLM-only reviews
My impression is that with every new revision the policy is watered down more. After the first iteration, I wrote that, while I’m not happy with the resulting policy, I think that it could at least be a preliminary compromise that would allow us to move forward together. Regarding the current version of the policy, my personal opinion is that it isn’t appropriate as such a compromise anymore. All the best, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
