Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> I have followed this list for some time, and can't but help believe
> there must be some simpler way to communicate with GHDL besides shared
> memory or environment variables.
Each communication channel has its strengths and weaknesses,
hence a recommended use or application.

> Isn't it "just" a matter of talking to ADA code?
no, because GHDL adds its own stuff to the ADA code.
and VHDL is more than ADA.

> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn_unw/Binding-with-Non_002dAda-Main-Programs.html
this is already described in the GHDL doc

> regards,
> Jakob
yg

-- 
http://ygdes.com / http://yasep.org


_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to