Thanks Christophe,
I tried it but it didn't work right away so I'll have to give that a
try after the holidays.

Greg


On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Christophe CURIS
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I understand recompiling ghdl may be quite complex, so there is another
> solution I could propose you to try, although I have not tested it:
>  ghdl -a -Wc,-m32 std_functions_pkg.vhd
>
> Basically, this tries to cross-compile to the 32-bits architecture, which is
> what your GHDL seems to expect. Note, on my side it failed (now generating
> the same error you have), but that's because my GHDL expects 64bits... So I
> can't be sure that is enough...
>
> Christophe.
>
>
> On Tuesday 21 December 2010 20:45, Greg Beaton wrote:
>> Thanks Christophe. I think you may be right. My linux is 64-bit.
>> Unfortunately now, I guess I have to install from source code which
>> has always been problematic with ghdl.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Christophe CURIS
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Works for me too, on 64bits linux...
>> > Some hints from google seems to point that you are trying to run a 32-bit
>> > version of GHDL (cf: "...gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu...") on a 64-bit machine.
>> >
>> > By the way, you are defining twice the "--workdir", which may not do what
>> > you expect...
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Christophe.
>> >
>> > On Thursday 16 December 2010 22:24, Greg Beaton wrote:
>> >> Is this a bug?
>> >>
>> >> I get a compile error but its reported in the s file generated by ghdl
>> >> - The s file is created but it is then processed by the assembler,
>> >> /usr/bin/as which flags an error in the s file.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I am using a binary distribution show below:
>> >>
>> >> [gbea...@wt0433 generic_lib]$ ghdl --version
>> >> GHDL 0.29 (20100109) [Sokcho edition]
>> >>  Compiled with GNAT Version: GPL 2008 (20080521)
>> >>  GCC back-end code generator
>> >> Written by Tristan Gingold.
>> >>
>> >> Copyright (C) 2003 - 2010 Tristan Gingold.
>> >> GHDL is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License.  There
>> >> is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> >> PURPOSE. [gbea...@wt0433 generic_lib]$
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> My gcc version is 4.1.2 (but I would think that that shouldn't matter
>> >> for the binary distribution).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In the example below, one of the base vhdl files (attached) is
>> >> compiled by itself and produces errors.
>> >>
>> >> [gbea...@wt0433 generic_lib]$ ghdl -a -g -v --workdir=work
>> >> --work=wavesat --ieee=synopsys std_functions_pkg.vhd
>> >> /usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.4/ghdl1 -g --workdir=work
>> >> --work=wavesat
>> >> -P/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.4/vhdl/lib//v93/std/
>> >> -P/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.4/vhdl/lib//v93/synopsys/
>> >> -quiet -o work/std_functions_pkg.s std_functions_pkg.vhd
>> >> /usr/bin/as -o work/std_functions_pkg.o work/std_functions_pkg.s
>> >> work/std_functions_pkg.s: Assembler messages:
>> >> work/std_functions_pkg.s:131: Error: suffix or operands invalid for
>> >> `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:208: Error: suffix or operands invalid
>> >> for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:259: Error: suffix or operands
>> >> invalid for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:300: Error: suffix or
>> >> operands invalid for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:328: Error: suffix
>> >> or operands invalid for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:360: Error:
>> >> suffix or operands invalid for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:392:
>> >> Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
>> >> work/std_functions_pkg.s:718: Error: suffix or operands invalid for
>> >> `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:744: Error: suffix or operands invalid
>> >> for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:970: Error: suffix or operands
>> >> invalid for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:1202: Error: suffix or
>> >> operands invalid for `push' work/std_functions_pkg.s:1397: Error: suffix
>> >> or operands invalid for `push' ghdl: compilation error
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Greg
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ghdl-discuss mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ghdl-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ghdl-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to