On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:20:21 +0100, you wrote: >Hi guys,
>then I gave the target=i586-mingw32msvc option a go. Turns out that >theory didn't work so far. Actually I had to comment this in >gcc/vhdl/Make-lang.in: > >vhdl.all.cross: > # @echo "No support for building vhdl cross-compiler" > # exit 1 That must have been there for a reason, but the reason may have been to reduce the permutations and testing required... >With some more library fiddling, I did eventually get a ghdl and ghdl1 >executable, but it turns out on installation (when trying to compile the >standard libraries for the target), that ghdl wants to use the _native_ >assembler, not the cross one. So now I don't know if I'm >just one step from the goal or on the completely wrong track. Even reporting that may turn out to be useful. I vaguely recall in my travels through the build system, seeing some option for (I didn't pay enough attention) to use a named assembler instead of the default... Alternatively, during an initial configuration problem I experimented with NOT passing the -s flag to ghdl1 which does the work, and it *appeared* to build a reasonable-looking .o directly. (at the time I had no way to test the resulting .o) That might give you another avenue (or dead end!) to explore... - Brian _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
