That's great.  For the first time, we're ahead of time!

Should we support 4.8 and 4.9 (and ...) at the same time or
focus on only one gcc version ?

Thanks!

Tristan.


----- Mail original -----
> This gcc Status Report [1] excerpt below suggests that the gcc4.9
> sources will be reasonably stable from the end of January onwards,
> though I can't find any mention of an actual (or proposed) release
> date.
> 
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-12/msg00203.html
> 
> So I am happy to report that with this patch
> ----------------------------------------------
> diff -r 224a5c2bc5ff ortho/gcc/ortho-lang.c
> --- a/ortho/gcc/ortho-lang.c  Wed Jan 22 12:27:03 2014 +0000
> +++ b/ortho/gcc/ortho-lang.c  Thu Jan 23 11:54:40 2014 +0000
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>  #include "tree-pass.h"
>  #include "tree-dump.h"
>  
> -//#define GCC49
> +#define GCC49
>  
>  #ifdef GCC49
>  
> ------------------------------------------------
> the trunk builds, installs and passes the testsuite using the
> gcc-4.9-20140112 snapshot.
> 
> There may be some further work to port it to the actual release, but
> I'm
> happy to report that the changes between last May and
> gcc-4.9-20140112
> took about a morning's work.
> 
> So I believe ghdl gcc builds are likely to be in good shape for a
> while.
> 
> - Brian
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2013-12-20)
> 
>     From: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
>     To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
>     Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:56:45 +0100 (CET)
>     Subject: GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2013-12-20)
>     Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
> 
> Status
> ======
> 
> The trunk remains in Stage 3 until the end of January at which
> point we enter regression-and-doc-fixes-only mode.
> 
> Quality is improving slowly as we are still getting a lot of
> new regressions, both due to increased testing and still merging
> a lot of code (please slow down and consider pushing back features
> for GCC 4.10).
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ghdl-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
> 

_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to