On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 16:11 -0500, Brian Davis wrote: > No change seen after applying that patch, see test log below. > I haven't had time to dig into why nothing changed.
> The bug16872 ticket shows the ghdl-gcc version as printing the > following useful message: > ./bug:error: bound check failure at bug.vhd:23 which is what we're trying for here... > test log: > > C:\Ghdl\testsuite\testsuite\gna\bug16782>ghdl -v > GHDL 0.31 (20140108) [Dunoon edition] +Patch for Integer Overflow > Message > C:\Ghdl\testsuite\testsuite\gna\bug16782>ghdl -r bug > This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an > unusual way. just to be clear : assuming ghdl -a and ghdl -e were run but not logged? Note the previous version apparently didn't report "overflow error" as the Linux mcode version did... Is it possible we're not actually getting to static EXCEPTION_DISPOSITION ghdl_SEH_handler(...) at all? Perhaps a printf (and an fflush(stdout) !) at its start could answer that... Has Windows exception handler registration changed? - Brian - Brian _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
