> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:21:24 +0100 (CET) > [email protected] wrote: > > > yes, I plan to use the GMGPL for the runtime. > > > > Excellent news! > > I did a quick search of the 0.32-dev source and didn't find any > mention of GMGPL, Modified_GPL, or LGPL. Tweaking all of the > headers manually can be an tedious chore. It might be more > interesting to [script][1] the job.
I think I have pushed the patches. If you look at sources in the get directory, they have: -- -- As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from this -- unit, or you link this unit with other files to produce an executable, -- this unit does not by itself cause the resulting executable to be -- covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does not -- however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be -- covered by the GNU Public License. (And yes, I used a script!) Tristan. _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
