On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:03:45 +0100 Tristan Gingold <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25/03/15 17:10, Adam Jensen wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:02:26 +0100 > > Tristan Gingold <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Great. Did you try vpi plugins ? I am not sure they will work. > > > > I haven't been able to find any GHDL-VPI documentation. > > > >> (OTOH, that's a minor issue). > > > > It would be nice if all of the capabilities of the tool were enabled and > > functioning on the BSD's. > > OTOH, if nobody uses that feature this restriction is not a real issue! Cool. I'll add it to my to-do/watch list and when an opportunity arises to investigate it further, I can revisit it. So far, 0.32rc2 (--rev 3f2fcad4d876) looks pretty good on FreeBSD-x86 (comparable to Linux except for the potential VPI issue (though, I can't verify whether or not it's actually an issue until I figure out how it works (are these nested parenthesis annoying? (lisp warped my mind)))). I haven't explored any gna test issues, yet. Currently, on Linux and FreeBSD, they stop at: GNA dir bug09: analyze univ1.vhdl elaborate and simulate (failure expected) univ1 univ1.vhdl:19:5:@0ms:(assertion error): i = -1 ./univ1:error: error expected, but none occured ghdl: compilation error _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
