On 21/09/15 22:29, Joris van Rantwijk wrote: > Right now I'm still hunting a nasty simulation regression which I can so far > only reproduce with a huge VHDL model of a microprocessor.
Well this one took a lot of time to figure out. It appears that an entity which lives outside the current "work" library can not be pulled in with a "component" statement. This is the case even if the entity location is explicitly declared with a "use" statement. I'm not sure whether this is correct behaviour according to the standard. All I know is that older versions of GHDL used to find such entities just fine. The behaviour changed with mercurial changeset d6ba6551b88c about a year ago. I just created ticket #94 on sourceforge with a testcase attached. https://sourceforge.net/p/ghdl-updates/tickets/94/ Joris. _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
