2015-11-23 21:21 GMT+01:00 Tristan Gingold <tging...@free.fr>:

> On 21/11/15 01:37, Peter LaDow wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:52 PM,  <why...@f-cpu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I suppose: because they can change several times during a delta cycle,
>>> so the final value would be irrelevant.
>>> If you want to spy on them, make your own "log"
>>> (with "report"s) or copy them to a dedicated signal.
>>>
>>> GHDL can work under GDB so you can also trace/single step
>>> the generated program.
>>>
>>
>> For my part, I'd like to see delta cycles logged.  We have some
>> testbench code that operates in delta cycles (zero time), and that's
>> impossible to see in GHDL.
>>
>
> You can use --disp-signals.
>
> There is no tool that is able to display delta cycles :-(
>

You probably mean no tool for GHDL?
Because Modelsim can display delta cycles and I already had some use cases
where that was really helpful.
It works in the waveform and you will see the current time + current number
of delta cycles.

Ralf
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to