On 2 Feb, Steinar H.Gunderson wrote: >> In my illusion at least making tags from events and the >> way back should be simpler... > The problem with Perl is the parsing step, not the recording step. We > already have well-working code for parsing/running Perl. That sentence doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I agree that we've got well-working code for parsing/running Perl, well, that's Perl :)... But where's the problem with the parsing step? And how do you produce Perl code? -- Servus, Daniel
- Re: Print plug-in Manish Singh
- Re: Print plug-in Daniel . Egger
- Usage of Gnome libs (was: Re: Print plugin) Sven Neumann
- Re: Usage of Gnome libs (was: Re: Print plugin) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Usage of Gnome libs (was: Re: Print plugin) Daniel . Egger
- Re: Print plug-in Marc Lehmann
- Re: Print plug-in Daniel . Egger
- Re: Print plug-in Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Print plug-in Daniel . Egger
- Re: Print plug-in Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Print plug-in Daniel . Egger
- Re: Print plug-in Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Print plug-in Marc Lehmann
- Re: Print plug-in Marc Lehmann
- Macros (was Re: Print plug-in) Ian Boreham
- Re: Print plug-in regis rampnoux
- Re: Print plug-in Marc Lehmann
- Re: Print plug-in Nick Lamb
- Re: Print plug-in Robert L Krawitz
- Re: Print plug-in Tomas Ogren
- Re: Print plug-in Marc Lehmann