On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 06:56:43PM +0100, Nick Lamb wrote: >Have now, it makes no difference, so that's another factor eliminated. >In fact, the integer code seems to produce the same image data as the >float code On my machine, the FP code usually generates _slightly_ (think 40-50 bytes) smaller files than the integer version. (I'm unable to find any quality improvement.) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://members.xoom.com/sneeze/
- Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes) Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes) Daniel . Egger
- Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Gimp Wishes (i18n and jpeg) Stanislav Brabec
- Re: Gimp Wishes (i18n and jpeg) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Gimp Wishes (i18n and jpeg) Ian Boreham
- Re: Gimp Wishes (i18n and jpeg) Nick Lamb
- Re: Gimp Wishes (i18n and jpeg) Nick Lamb
- Re: Gimp Wishes (jpeg) Steinar H. Gunderson
- Re: Gimp Wishes (jpeg) Stanislav Brabec
- Re: Gimp Wishes (jpeg) Marc Lehmann
- JPEG correction (was Re: Gimp Wishes) Nick Lamb
- Re: JPEG correction (was Re: Gimp Wishes) Marc Lehmann
- Re: JPEG correction (was Re: Gimp Wishes... Nick Lamb
- Re: JPEG correction (was Re: Gimp Wi... Marc Lehmann
- Re: JPEG correction (was Re: Gi... Jon Winters
- Improved Export behaviour f... Nick Lamb
- Re: Improved Export behavio... Sven Neumann
- Re: Improved Export behavio... Marc Lehmann