2012-05-09 10:41 keltezéssel, Michael Natterer írta:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:55 +0300, Cristian Secară wrote:
În data de Wed, 09 May 2012 09:20:23 +0200, Michael Natterer a scris:
what was commited on 10 Feb 2012 is:
commit eb93f484c8ad8da3606ab1b44ab8a7f143ea089e
Author: Daniel Șerbănescu<cyber19ri...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Feb 10 19:35:57 2012 +0100
Updated Romanian translation
po-script-fu/ro.po | 4003
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 1603 insertions(+), 2400 deletions(-)
and puts the file exactly into the current state. Please tell the
committer that he messed up and have him restore the file to what you
translated.
Hmm, strange. Ok, I will tell him, but I cannot do that right away,
I mean not before the template file from 2.8 script-fu will be reverted
too.
What is common with this 61 number ? Why was my file screwed in February
down to 61 strings and now in May the template file and the rest of all
languages also screwed down to 61 strings ? I find hard to believe
(though possible) that in February it was just the committer fault.
So, when will be the 2.8 script-fu template reverted ?
You are right, generating a new template results in 62 strings.
There seems to be a bug in intltool-update --pot that only
extracts strings which immediately follow a '(', so
(_"foo" ends up in the template
but
_"foo" doesn't.
At least that's the pattern I found when looking at the pot file
and the scheme source files.
To the folks on gnome-i...@gnome.org: did you ever hear of this
issue? Can you investigate it? I'm sure there are more i18n experts
on gnome-i...@gnome.org than on gimp-developer-list ;)
Yes, I met this here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations/+bug/986897
Seems like a recent change in intltool causes this, which makes the
scheme string extraction done by xgettext instead of intltools built-in
and dropped parser.
In turn, http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Scheme
says that the gettext shorthand for scheme strings is (_"foo"), so I
think your source files should be modified to conform this notation.
Regards
Gabor Kelemen
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
