You are correct, Marco. On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Marco Ciampa <ciam...@libero.it> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:19:34PM -0500, Chris Mohler wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Marco Ciampa <ciam...@libero.it> wrote: > > > Since with GIMP 2.6.x series there was no even only releases, I should > > > assume that it is changed the versioning scheme for stable/even > > > unstable/odd even for 3rd point releases, so the next stable 2.8 > release > > > will be 2.8.4? > > > > Err no. 2.6 was stable, 2.7 development, 2.8 stable, 2.9 development... > > > > Chris > > So what? Where is the 2.8.1 version gone? > > -- > > > Marco Ciampa > > +--------------------+ > | Linux User #78271 | > | FSFE fellow #364 | > +--------------------+ > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > gimp-developer-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > -- Please note that this signature is licensed under the General Public License. By embedding the signature, or parts of it, into your brain other than by mere aggregation, your brain becomes a combined, and therefore derived, work and thus must be licensed under the GPL too.
_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
