No. GIGO applies here - GIMP assumes that the state of the image when you hit Save is exactly what you want to be saved to disk, so that's precisely what it does. In cases where it's not (such as with resizing the whole image) GIMP has no way to tell know better.
However, a resize-during-export could make an interesting feature request.... -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com -------------------- Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. > Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:58:20 -0700 > From: w...@ieee.org > To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-user] [Request] Do not confirm closing if > unsaved image was exported/overwrited ? > > This sounds to me like a bug - possibly a specification error? > > Certainly adds some possibly useful context to the longlasting (and > unfortunately overly acrimonious) dispute about the save-export behavior in > 2.8. > > In my experience, it is extremely difficult to apprehend all the varieties of > ways people like to use complex tools, especially in a world environment > enamored with the famous Steve Jobs aphorism - "things should 'just work'" - > and > adapting - even when necessary - is uncomfortable, and often painful. > > -- Burnie > > On 09/16/2012 08:10 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote: > > > > > From: l...@holoweb.net > > > To: ofn...@laposte.net > > > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:23:36 -0400 > > > CC: gimp-user-l...@gnome.org > > > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] [Request] Do not confirm closing if unsaved > > > image > > was exported/overwrited ? > > > > > > On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 23:12 +0200, Ofnuts wrote: > > > > [...] saving as XCF > > > > "by accident" may make you lose some time, but will never make you lose > > > > data, because you can always save the JPG again from the XCF. > > > > > > This isn't always true. > > > > > > For example, after working on a photograph I scale it down e.g. to 600 > > > pixels across, and export a jpeg. If at that point I save the xcf file, > > > I will lose data, because xcf does not store the undo history. > > > > > > Yes, I could use ImageMagick to scale the image, but (1) I do want to > > > see the jpeg preview, as it often needs some extra work in curves or > > > sharpen, and (2) I'm already in gimp :) > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > -- > > > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > > > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > > > Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > gimp-user-list mailing list > > > gimp-user-l...@gnome.org > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > > > > That is unfortunately true, GIMP has no ability to automatically scale-down > > the image to a different size as part of the export process. When you hit > > Save GIMP records everything necessary to recreate the image *as it was > > when > > you hit Save*, whether it is the preferred way of storing your overall > > project > > file or not. The XCF is not a full version repository logging everything > > that > > happened to the image since its creation - I imagine that should be the > > role > > of an XCF subformat so that the user has per-file control over whether or > > not > > they need that extra information taking up extra hard drive space. > > > > -- Stratadrake > > strata_ran...@hotmail.com > > -------------------- > > Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gimp-user-list mailing list > > gimp-user-l...@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > gimp-developer-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
