* Thomas W <twhitmore...@gmail.com> [09-15-13 18:51]:
> Hi Marc, list members,
> 
> Yes, I encounter awkwardness with the Save dialog & autocomplete
> triggering. You will also note that 'autocomplete' triggering blocks Enter
> from actually saving..  it also blocks Alt-S (or whatever Windows shortcut)
> from working.
> 
> I'm not a big fan of autocomplete for "Save" -- if I wanted a similar name
> to an existing file, I'd expect to select the existing file in the list &
> change the name in the edit field. Since "autocomplete" here interferes
> strongly with the expected/standard UI, I'd consider the best usability to
> remove it entirely.
> 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698481
> 
> Failing that, "autocomplete" should be reworked so as not to block the
> dialog's main keybindings. (Perhaps this would be useful for the 'Open'
> dialog.)
> 
> Marc, you'd be welcome to add you comment in Bugzilla & hopefully "vote"
> usability issues a little higher priority. Other people notice this issue?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> 
> > once in a while, when I want to save a file, and get into the safe
> dialog, when I start typing, the text appears
> > right below in a search box instead of in the filename box. I do not know
> how to reproduce this yet, but it
> > happens ever so often and it is a bit annoying.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:00 AM, 
> <gimp-developer-list-requ...@gnome.org>wrote:
> 
> > Send gimp-developer-list mailing list submissions to
> >         gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >         https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         gimp-developer-list-requ...@gnome.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         gimp-developer-list-ow...@gnome.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of gimp-developer-list digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re:  refactor palette loading code (Warren Turkal)
> >    2. Re:  refactor palette loading code (Warren Turkal)
> >    3.  Dialog Safe text entered appears in searchbox    instead
> >       filenamebox annoying (Marc Kroeks (zonnet.nl))
> >    4. Re:  refactor palette loading code (Jehan Pag?s)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 01:17:46 -0700
> > From: Warren Turkal <w...@penguintechs.org>
> > To: Michael Henning <dra...@darkrefraction.com>
> > Cc: Graphical Geniuses <gimp-developer-list@gnome.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] refactor palette loading code
> > Message-ID:
> >         <CAB_jBhh6FLb-bqbJSH5H=
> > h_rgfeq0gyxq8tbeyq2ilefztd...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Sorry for taking so long to respond. I don't have a lot of time during
> > normal work days to work on this. :)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Michael Henning
> > <dra...@darkrefraction.com>wrote:
> >
> > > I made a few minor nitpicks on your commit on github. If you would fix
> > > those points, I'll commit your code to master.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. I think I addressed all your comments. However, I just added a
> > rewind at the end of gimp_palette_load_detect format instead of doing what
> > your comment suggested. PTAL and see if you approve. Here's the
> > link<https://github.com/wt/gimp/tree/refactor_palette_loader_try2>.
> > I have also attached a patch to this mail.
> >
> > As a side note for the future, the fastest way to get a patch reviewed
> > > is normally if you post it to a pastebin and bother people on irc.
> > >
> >
> > I am not in a huge hurry, and I haven't had much luck catching folks on IRC
> > when I am on. Is there really any benefit of using pastebin over pushing my
> > branch out so that it can be looked at and fetched? The pastebin method
> > seems like it'd be pretty inconvenient for bigger patches, and it doesn't
> > have any kind of commenting on the patch. Also, which pastebin do you
> > prefer?
> >
> > I will say that I was surprised there wasn't more interest in using git to
> > pass around these patches. I would have expected you folks to acquire the
> > patch from my repository (e.g. fetch my branch from my repo and look at the
> > branch directly). I was somewhat surprised by the request for a patch file.
> >
> > With regard to git, I don't see any merges in the history for the project.
> > Does this project not do git merges?
> >
> >   -- drawoc
> > >
> > > P.S. I don't see the patch on that last email. Are you sure you attached
> > > it?
> > >
> >
> > It appears to be attached on my end. Does the ML block attachments?
> >
> > FWIW, I also attached the new diff to this email. It indeed does appear to
> > be attached at this point.
> >
> > wt
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 01:32:27 -0700
> > From: Warren Turkal <w...@penguintechs.org>
> > To: Jehan Pag?s <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Graphical Geniuses <gimp-developer-list@gnome.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] refactor palette loading code
> > Message-ID:
> >         <
> > cab_jbhhsx4bfw4k-8u8prp4-s7xcn4xjsqbhy80yfs8uvuh...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Jehan Pag?s <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Michael Henning
> > > <dra...@darkrefraction.com> wrote:
> > >  > As a side note for the future, the fastest way to get a patch reviewed
> > > > is normally if you post it to a pastebin and bother people on irc.
> > >
> > > For my own, I would prefer a git format-patch like this, but on a
> > > feature request/bug report on bugzilla. That's easy to patch a branch
> > > and to remove after. And also we keep track of any discussion or
> > > updated patch about a feature/fix. For instance go find this email
> > > thread in one year in the mailing history.
> > >
> >
> > Even for small refactorings like this one? I would certainly understand
> > that for a feature add or a major refactor, but it seems like a lot of
> > overhead for a pretty small refactor like this one. However, I am willing
> > to do whatever you folks want since I just wanna help the project. However,
> > please keep in mind that I have very little time to commit to this kind of
> > work.
> >
> > > P.S. I don't see the patch on that last email. Are you sure you attached
> > > it?
> > >
> > > I see it but I was also a direct recipient. I guess that the list
> > > cleans emails out from any attached file.
> > > Could we have conditional filters? Like any text file with a ".patch"
> > > or ".diff" extension should not be filtered out.
> > >
> >
> > You should also allow git bundle files, which are a way to pass around git
> > commits. I have attached one to this mail that includes the second
> > iteration of my change. I guess only direct receivers of the email will
> > receive it.
> >
> > wt
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 10:20:26 +0200
> > From: "Marc Kroeks \(zonnet.nl\)" <mkro...@zonnet.nl>
> > To: <gimp-developer-list@gnome.org>
> > Subject: [Gimp-developer] Dialog Safe text entered appears in
> >         searchbox       instead filenamebox annoying
> > Message-ID: <33D9B1E32EE54F17BBCBD88520908D3E@contextual>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > once in a while, when I want to save a file, and get into the safe dialog,
> > when I start typing, the text appears right below in a search box instead
> > of in the filename box.
> > I do not know how to reproduce this yet, but it happens ever so often and
> > it is a bit annoying.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Marc.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:22:14 +1200
> > From: Jehan Pag?s <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com>
> > To: Warren Turkal <w...@penguintechs.org>
> > Cc: Graphical Geniuses <gimp-developer-list@gnome.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] refactor palette loading code
> > Message-ID:
> >         <
> > cafgjpj8xeyzarftv5zijkvkaues2kcqj_dbrw8mxndmrior...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Warren Turkal <w...@penguintechs.org>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Jehan Pag?s <jehan.marmott...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Michael Henning
> > >> <dra...@darkrefraction.com> wrote:
> > >> > As a side note for the future, the fastest way to get a patch reviewed
> > >> > is normally if you post it to a pastebin and bother people on irc.
> > >>
> > >> For my own, I would prefer a git format-patch like this, but on a
> > >> feature request/bug report on bugzilla. That's easy to patch a branch
> > >> and to remove after. And also we keep track of any discussion or
> > >> updated patch about a feature/fix. For instance go find this email
> > >> thread in one year in the mailing history.
> > >
> > >
> > > Even for small refactorings like this one? I would certainly understand
> > that
> > > for a feature add or a major refactor, but it seems like a lot of
> > overhead
> > > for a pretty small refactor like this one. However, I am willing to do
> > > whatever you folks want since I just wanna help the project. However,
> > please
> > > keep in mind that I have very little time to commit to this kind of work.
> >
> > Well there are no strict rules, I guess, likely because the team is
> > small. I guess the real "rule" is to do so that others are not annoyed
> > by the form your patch (so that they will actually check it, and not
> > delay it to forever). Which means that if the other developers are ok
> > with a git bundle for instance (I did not even know what it is, I had
> > to look it up), or by adding your repo as a remote, well that's all
> > good. :-)
> >
> > I am myself flexible and adapt to various team logics. But by
> > experience, I know some others of the core GIMP team want git
> > format-patch. When I made my first patches (I am myself likely the
> > most recent of the core developers), I also set up a public git repo
> > for others to fetch. Well I was told my patches would more likely be
> > reviewed if I provided patch files instead. And now I got used to it,
> > so I work also easily with these. That's not more time-consuming.
> > With a patch formatted with `git format-patch`, you can just "git
> > apply" it, and done! So easy to review (and also to commit if the
> > patch looks good with with git am, nothing to do).
> >
> > I believe that at the opposite, for small patches, it is much easier
> > to provide patch files than maintain a public repo. For huge features
> > which require many commits over weeks, yeah there probably a public
> > branch is worth it. :-)
> >
> > Jehan
> >
> > >> > P.S. I don't see the patch on that last email. Are you sure you
> > attached
> > >> > it?
> > >>
> > >> I see it but I was also a direct recipient. I guess that the list
> > >> cleans emails out from any attached file.
> > >> Could we have conditional filters? Like any text file with a ".patch"
> > >> or ".diff" extension should not be filtered out.
> > >
> > >
> > > You should also allow git bundle files, which are a way to pass around
> > git
> > > commits. I have attached one to this mail that includes the second
> > iteration
> > > of my change. I guess only direct receivers of the email will receive it.
> > >
> > > wt
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gimp-developer-list mailing list
> > gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of gimp-developer-list Digest, Vol 24, Issue 20
> > ***************************************************
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

I don't appear to have the problem on linux.  Perhaps it is a problem
related to windows.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA          @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.org    openSUSE Community Member    facebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.org        Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://linuxcounter.net
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

Reply via email to