Elle,
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong
man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The
credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred
by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes
short again and again, because there is no effort without error and
shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great
enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who
at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the
worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place
shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor
defeat."
- Theodore Roosevelt
Time for you to stop making vaguely patronising remarks and make an
actionable suggestion, or leave this.
Hugs and positivity,
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Elle Stone
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:43 PM
Cc: gegl-developer-list ; Gimp-developer
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] babl roadmap: How do you know
which images are sRGB images?
On 10/14/2014 07:16 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Elle Stone
<ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com> wrote:
On 10/13/2014 06:36 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
So again, upon opening an image, how do you plan to detect whether the
image
is an sRGB image or not?
Will you compare MD5 checksums?
Will you consult the profile descriptions?
Will you examine the profile colorants and TRCs?
Most likely examination of profile colorants/TRCs since that is
what ICC or other color profile meta-data aware image loaders needs to
provide down to babl anyways.
You did pick the only plausible answer: check the colorants and TRCs.
In many
circumstances it is desirable to to treat almost sRGB as sRGB and
consider deviance from the real standard a mistake in labeling; for
instance if it is a low bitdepth image containing dithering - at other
times assuming that the slight off profile has been applied as is
earlier in the production pipeline might be desirable.
For most users, for most purposes, you as developer can probably decide
for the user that "slight off" means "close enough". The trouble is you
don't know whether "slight off" is a mistake or intentional.
The profile maker might have used something other than Bradford
adaptation to make the profile. This is allowed by the ICC specs, and
would result in slightly different colorants.
The artist might be fully aware that the profile is not exactly like the
GIMP built-in profile, and nonetheless intend to use the embedded sRGB
profile instead of the GIMP built-in sRGB profile. Perhaps the existing
gray axis needs to be preserved.
And so on. You think it's OK to second-guess and decide for the artist
what happens to the artist's RGB data. But it's really not OK.
Elle Stone
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
