Nick Lamb wrote: > One thing I can't seem to find out (maybe I'm looking in the wrong place) > is whether EXIF data is supposed to follow derived works or not. Some > contributors to this thread seemed to feel that it was important that > a Gimp image must always preserve the EXIF data, but this would only > make sense is EXIF is indeed a historical record of the source, and not > live metadata. Can someone clear that up (preferably with a reference > to an EXIF standards document or something) ?
Presumably (and this is just me - I have nothing to support this) that depends on the data. For example, copyright would have to follow the normal rules of derived works (whatever they may be), as would author, but something like GPS (which relates directly to where the image was originally captured) could be copied through unchanged. Some data logically stays read-only, and some data should be modifiable (one example of each would, presumably, be flash energy and image history respectively). Cheers, Dave. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
