Hi, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> If we would design our own extremely simple wrapper format there would be > no need to work with the compatibility mess existing formats are (all of > them :). If we say that access by other tools than gimp is not important > we could get away with an extremely simple format, say, cat files*, index > at end which could be just offset and length, indexed by number, meta-info > is all handled by an xml "sub"-file. > > The question is simply wether it should be a standard format or not. I would really like to see a format that is suited to serve as a more general exchange format for image data. If possible it should not be designed as a GIMP-only format. People already use XCF in other apps simply because there is no reasonable format for layered images. So there's seems to be a need for such a format which is why I would like to make access to it as simple as possible. Of course this goal could also be achieved by providing a library that handles whatever weirdo binary format we come up with... Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
