On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Sven Neumann wrote: > >What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and > >compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for > >historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to > >move it into the GIMP source tree if it was started as a separate > >project. Why would you want to do this with GEGL now? > > What's wrong with having gegl sources to download with the latest > release on the FTP server, the same way we used to have libaa, libmpg, > libpng and all the other stuff we needed? Up until 1.2.x, we used to > have gtk+ and glib sources with gimp sources. What was wrong with that?
Actually, as far as I can recall, the gtk+ and gimp sources were not in the same directory since before 1.0.0. -Yosh _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
