Hi, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Following what you (Sven) said in the previous mail, it also seems > like the libgimp parts are independent of the original code, and calls > the original functions via a PDB proxy, so licence issues wouldn't > come into it. Well, there are license issues when a non-GPL application makes calls to GPL-ed code by whatever means. This is a difficult subject and it's hard to judge if a plug-in should be considered part of the GIMP application (which would mean that the GPL applies) or if it's a mere aggregation as per section 2 of the GNU General Public License. Our position on this is outlined in the file LICENSE which is included with the GIMP source tree. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
