Hi, Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's slower, measurable and reproducible slower. > > As a benchmark I used a gradient fill in a 3000x3000px (68.8M) > image. I get consistently times of 8s for 1 thread and between > 9.2s and 9.6s for 2 threads. With a running application, after a > restart -- doesn't matter. > > What is strange though, is that it only seems two use one CPU > for both threads; maybe a stupid gthread implementation? What version did you test? What's the last ChangeLog entry? Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
