On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote: > This is intentional - google for "reply to considered harmful".
This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to mailing lists which do set the Reply-to header. Nowadays, I'd say that the opposite is true, since setting the Reply-to header seems common practice (at least if I look at the mailing lists I'm following, there are only 2 that don't set the header). -- < Jernej Simoncic ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ > It's on the other side. -- Preudhomme's Law of Window Cleaning _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
