Hi, On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 22:54 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > That's fine, but it doesn't deal with the problem of how the file > > plug-in deals with the actual export. So far the gimp_export_image() > > functions does take care of all the nasty details. We definitely don't > > want to duplicate that code all over the place. > > > > The plan is to let plug-ins still use gimp_export_image() for creating > an image suitable for exporting, it's just that we will remove that > function's bad habit of asking annoying questions in the process. This > is slight change in API semantics, but the ABI/API is still unchanged > and I don't consider this a problem. That will break all file plug-ins that use gimp_export_image(). I am sorry, but that is totally not an option. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
