2011/3/16 Carol Spears <ca...@gimp.org>: > martin, if in, oh, lets say 3 days, March 18, 2011 the majority of your list > items are not commited, perhaps you should consider stepping aside. > "releases" > don't attract developers. look at the history! gimp-1.0 - gimp-1.2, 1997 > thru > 2000. lots of contributors, lots of development, lots of ideas, lots of bug > fixing. it was a lot of fun. > > sometimes, you gotta quit -- and see if that helps things. i sure didn't like > what was going on, i needed to be forced to quit. so, okay fine, i quit for > more than two years, maybe more than three and you know what? the problem > wasn't me because all of the things that i did not like persisted and there > was no improvement in involvement -- in fact, involvement (especially by > people who can fix bugs and have some knowlege of gimps innards) dropped off. > > i cannot force you to quit the way i was forced to quit. i can only ask you > to > consider this and also that before you quit, that you removed the buildbot > stuff from gimp's source and put it into eh, lets say buildbots source on the > same server. that way, other projects can become rejuvinated with buildbot > product the way that gimp has been. i was told that it was a gnome project > afterall...
Hi Carol, Thank you for sharing your concerns. I will quit when the majority of contributing members of the GIMP community wants me to quit. Regards, Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Why GIMP 2.8 is not released yet" _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
