On 22 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: > With the usage of static array and buffer lengths you demonstrated in > your patch it will most likely introduce one or two new bugs, but > that could easily be hacked up a little cleaner Okay, I took some of the comments and updated the files. I'm now using a single linked list to store the domains and I reindented the source to match the other files. Patch attached... -- Servus, Daniel
- PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Manish Singh
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Glyph Lefkowitz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Marc Lehmann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Jon A. Cruz
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Sven Neumann
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solut... Daniel . Egger
- Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution Daniel . Egger