On Tue, 30 May 2000 20:04:02 +0200 (MEST), Jens Finke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I think c) is the best solution. It's surely quite hard to find _all_ >contributors to the code. Actually, I think that the version that was initially put into CVS was pure S&P, so the CVS log should adequately document all contributors since then. Kelly
- XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Federico Mena Quintero
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Phil Schwan
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf kelly
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Austin Donnelly
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Michael Natterer
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Jay Cox
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Alan Cox
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Marc Lehmann
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Havoc Pennington
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Jens Finke
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Martin Baulig
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Havoc Pennington
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Martin Baulig
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Havoc Pennington
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pi... Martin Baulig
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Miguel de Icaza
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Sven Neumann
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Sri Ramkrishna
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Nils Philippsen
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Alan Cox