On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> >Testing autoconf...
> >expr: syntax error
> >too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14
> > [ ... ]
>
> Most likely, you have 2.14a or something like that.
Yes I have 2.14a
> I sent a patch
> to Sven a few days ago that should fix this -- you may want to do
> a CVS update to see if he's commited it. If not, here's the patch I
> sent Sven:
> [ ... ]
This patch was already applied when I first report this buglet.
It seems that $VER contains more than one line.
The following patch fixes that problem:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff -Nru gimp.orig/autogen.sh gimp/autogen.sh
--- gimp.orig/autogen.sh Sat Jun 24 02:32:27 2000
+++ gimp/autogen.sh Sun Jun 25 15:21:56 2000
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
echo
echo "Testing autoconf... "
-VER=`autoconf --version | sed "s/.* \([0-9.]*\)[a-z]\?$/\1/"`
+VER=`autoconf --version | grep autoconf | sed "s/.* \([0-9.]*\)[a-z]\?$/\1/"`
if expr $VER \>= 2.13 >/dev/null; then
echo "looks OK."
else
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of the French Book: Programmation Linux avec GTK+
"My husband commits an inconceivable act of perversion with a
barnyard animal, and it's not central to my case?!"
"Not in California."