Philip Rhoades wrote: > It still seems counter intuitive that opening a JPG (even if it is a > photo rather than a computer generated image) and immediately saving it > with 100% "quality" increases the size by 2.5 . .
so you mean the scale should be different? Like 1 .. 10 ... 100 ... 100000 ^ ^ | \ extravagant luxury quality for the filthy rich current "90" default i'm not shure if that would not create even more confusion... regards, peter PS: as Michael Schumacher previously noted, the quality value is indeed just a number, not a percentage. _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user