>>PIMP - The Photoshop-like Image Manipulation Program >That one gets my vote, but only if the acronym can stand for >"Primary Image Manipulation Program." After all, the title should >be as accurately descriptive as possible.
>IMO the idea that GIMP is somehow "chasing after" or "trying to be" >an Adobe product is very dangerous, and it comes straight from >Adobe's marketing department. I happen to LIKE the difference, and >by like I mean, the differences have a positive impact on my >productivity. >Does Gnome try to "be" the latest Microsoft or MAC desktop >interface? Does VLC try to "be" Windows Media Player, or Amarok >aspire to "be" iTunes? Do the users of these tools feel compelled >to name a commercial package that does roughly the same things every >time they mention the tool they DO use? Fully agree with that. Includes word «Photoshop» in name is big self disrespect > My vote: leave it alone. Also agree with you. However rebranding would not prevent. _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
