2013/2/18 maderios <mader...@gmail.com>:
> On 02/18/2013 04:45 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>>>
>>> Von: maderios <mader...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> 3) These developers have created gimp according to their own practice.
>>
>>
>> Have a look at http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign
>>
>> While I wouldn't say that the team are no developers, they probably aren't
>> by your definition.
>>
>> Your problem is that this team managed to convince the developers (by your
>> definition) to implement their plans. And apparently those are spreading to
>> other software.
>>
> These guys are "architects", they don't need Gimp...
> No artists, photographers, designers.........
> Photoshop was made for professional photographers....
> That's the difference.
> Photoshop / Saving images
> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshop/cs/using/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-7783a.html

Then please use Photoshop and leave us alone!

Puisque Photoshop est parfait, pourquoi vouloir que GIMP n'en soit
qu'une pâle imitation ? (Since Photoshop is perfect, why do you want
GIMP to be only a poor imitation?)

Olivier Lecarme
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to