2013/2/18 maderios <mader...@gmail.com>: > On 02/18/2013 04:45 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >>> >>> Von: maderios <mader...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> 3) These developers have created gimp according to their own practice. >> >> >> Have a look at http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign >> >> While I wouldn't say that the team are no developers, they probably aren't >> by your definition. >> >> Your problem is that this team managed to convince the developers (by your >> definition) to implement their plans. And apparently those are spreading to >> other software. >> > These guys are "architects", they don't need Gimp... > No artists, photographers, designers......... > Photoshop was made for professional photographers.... > That's the difference. > Photoshop / Saving images > http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshop/cs/using/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-7783a.html
Then please use Photoshop and leave us alone! Puisque Photoshop est parfait, pourquoi vouloir que GIMP n'en soit qu'une pâle imitation ? (Since Photoshop is perfect, why do you want GIMP to be only a poor imitation?) Olivier Lecarme _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list