Alright, so first off, I've made the CSS almost fully valid. It turns out that using the IE gradient filter was causing all the problems. Anyway, the only error that's coming up now is because I'm using the *::selection*selector to change the background of text when it's highlighted. Not to big of a deal so I think I'll just leave it at that.
First off, this is really great work. It's awesome seeing this come to > life. Thanks! The original design I did (http://d.pr/i/LYn8) was intended to work within > a responsive, flexible grid- specifically, Twitter Bootstrap ( > http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/). Regardless of the content being > for a desktop application, there's no reason to discount the use case of > someone learning about GIMP while on the bus, and visiting the site on > their phone. The awesome thing about Bootstrap is that the "mobile > version" comes in the framework for free without the need for any extra dev > work. I see. Alright, I'll leave this version up for now and make changes to it as suggestions come it but I'll work on a separate one using Twitter Bootstrap. Just wanted to pop in and say thanks for all the hard work! :) Feel free > to hit me directly if you have any questions/concerns. No problem! I love doing this sort of thing! And thanks, I'll keep that in mind :) On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Mike Finch <i...@1sixty.com> wrote: > Hey guys/Kasim, > > First off, this is really great work. It's awesome seeing this come to > life. > > The original design I did (http://d.pr/i/LYn8) was intended to work > within a responsive, flexible grid- specifically, Twitter Bootstrap ( > http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/). Regardless of the content being > for a desktop application, there's no reason to discount the use case of > someone learning about GIMP while on the bus, and visiting the site on > their phone. The awesome thing about Bootstrap is that the "mobile > version" comes in the framework for free without the need for any extra dev > work. > > Regarding the background, I totally agree that a blurred, less distracting > version would be more effective. Very good call. > > Just wanted to pop in and say thanks for all the hard work! :) Feel free > to hit me directly if you have any questions/concerns. > > > * > Mike Finch // > ** > 1sixty.com > * > * > Twitter // @160south > * > > On Friday, April 12, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Chris Mohler wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kasim Ahmic <kasim.ah...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > To be completely honest, I purposefully avoided mobile support. Considering > that GIMP is a desktop exclusive program, I figured that adding mobile > support would be a waste of time. If there is enough demand for it, > however, > I'll attempt to add it. > > > I would at least have a look at adding something like bootstrap. > Adding a few classes to your divs and you'd be 99% done. Most > elements would then scale to fit tablets/mobile, etc. > > Use case A: I'm out at the bar and talking about design work. My > companion mentions how all the software you need is expensive. I > point out GIMP can handle quite a bit, esp when it comes to web and > photos. My companion asks "can it do X"? I look it up on the site. > Site looks bad == project looks bad. > > Use case B: Loss of internet connection, no local help installed, but > access to web via a mobile data plan. Easy to access the docs on the > phone. > > I doubt these cases are common, really - but using something like > bootstrap or unsemantic doesn't take long and handles them nicely. > > Just my opinion really - I see it as a relatively small amount of > effort even if the gains are small. > > Chris > > >
_______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
